Marine Conservation Agreements
A Conservation Practitioner's Toolkit

2.1 Conservation priorities and goals are place-based or affected by place-based management.

Ecuador Priority Areas. Image ©The Nature Conservancy

Conservation Priorities and Goals

You should first understand what your conservation priorities and goals are. Then you can determine if they are place-based or affected by place-based management.

For the purposes of this toolkit, conservation prioritiesare what you aim to conserve, such as ocean and coastal species, habitats, resources, or ecological processes targeted for conservation. Conservation goals are the ways you wish to affect those priorities, such as maintaining current population levels, increasing habitat area by 30%, or protecting 100% of an area.

Conservation organizations should be able to clearly articulate the priorities and long-term goals for a particular site or resource before pursuing a lease or ownership strategy. A goal to simply protect a site is decidedly different from a goal to restore impaired ecological functions. A goal to educate the public may require a very different authorization than undertaking scientific research. The statement of goals should also take into consideration how the current owners view the use and management of the site.

Place-based Nature of Priorities

Leasing and ownership strategies are most appropriate when conservation priorities are place-based or affected by place-based management. Place-based priorities include species, habitats, resources, or ecological processes that are more or less restricted to specific geographic locations. Place-based priorities often include:

  • Intertidal and subtidal sediments;
  • Flora and fauna attached to sediments; and
  • Structures (historical, cultural, or habitat).

Generally, mobile targets such as fish, water, and air cannot be directly leased or owned in the ocean and coastal environments. There are, however, exceptions, such as the sale of fishing concessions in some Latin America countries, which give private entities exclusive rights to fish in specific geographic areas. In some circumstances, mobile priorities may be indirectly protected through leasing or ownership.

Conservation priorities that can be affected by place-based management are those that are influenced by geographically-based threats. Geographically-based threats include activities and structures such as:

  • Shoreline hardening and development;
  • Over-water structures;
  • Aquaculture; and
  • Public use and access areas.

Generally, mobile threats such as air pollution, water pollution, and navigation are more difficult to manage through leasing and ownership strategies.

Methods to Identify Priorities and Goals

There's nearly no end to the number of species, habitats, resources, or ecological processes thatconservation organizations could attempt to protect and restore within ocean and coastal environments. As such, determining where to work and what to work on is an essential step in the leasing andownership process. There are at least two distinct ways to sort through the seemingly endless array of possibilities:

  1. Taking immediate advantage of opportunities as they arise, or
  2. Setting priorities through an established methodical process.

Both options have pros and cons.

1. Opportunism

Conservation organizations may identify leasing and ownership projects opportunistically. Examples of existing or emergent opportunities that may lead to leasing and ownership projects include an offer from a willing donor or seller, funding availability, partnership interests, or unique niches that have not been filled. Conservation organizations may also be interested in testing leasing and ownership as strategies and, as such, may first determine where leasing or ownership can occur, then determine which areas are of conservation interest, and lastly determine what activities can be undertaken to protect the conservation interests. In this case, the proprietary standing afforded conservation organizations that lease or own lands and resources within ocean and coastal waters may lead to more methodical planning processes in partnership with management agencies.

2. Methodical Process

The Nature Conservancy (TNC) prioritizes its work across landscapes by undertaking Ecoregional Assessments (ERAs) specifically for marine and coastal environments (see the Global Marine Team's prioritization work). ERAs guide biodiversity protection by identifying priority places, habitats, and species for conservation. While other organizations and agencies have also prioritized ocean and coastal areas for protection, TNC has completed several ERAs that focus on ocean and coastal environments. TNC encourages organizations and agencies to adopt the outcomes and use the data developed as part of the ERAs. The Nature Conservancy's Ecoregional Assessments can be downloaded from the following web sites:

Once priority geographies have been established by identifying species, habitats, resources, or ecological processes in need of conservation, an evaluation of threats and strategies can be undertaken. This latter evaluation will help you determine if leasing and ownership can abate the threats to the species and habitats you have identified as needing protection.

 

Step 1: Getting Started
1.1 Lease and Own 101
1.2 Myths
1.3 Important Terms
Step 2: Decision Checklist
2.1 Conservation Priorities
2.2 Threats and Strategies
2.3 Organization Capacity
2.4 Ownership and Use
2.5 Laws and Policies
2.6 Owners and Agencies
2.7 Partners and Funders
Step 3: Acquisition Checklist
3.1 Project Initiation
3.2 Title Report
3.3 Owner Contact
3.4 Proposal Completion
3.5 Terms and Conditions
3.6 Funding
3.7 Documentation
3.8 Due Diligence
3.9 Regulatory Permits
3.10 Final Actions
3.11 Site Plan
Step 4: Implementation
4.1 Science
4.2 Habitat
4.3 Maintenance
4.4 Public Use
4.5 Enforcement
4.6 Outreach
Country Summaries
Belize
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Indonesia
Mexico
Peru
United States
Other Countries
U.S. State Summaries
Alabama
Alaska
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Virginia
Washington
Other States
Case Studies
Agreement: Ecuador
Agreement: Fiji
Agreement: Philippines
Agreement: Phoenix Islands
Concession: Chile
Lease: California
Lease: Connecticut
Lease: Indonesia 1
Lease: Indonesia 2
Lease: Tanzania
Lease: Washington
Lease/Own: California
Lease/Own: UK
License: Rhode Island
Own: Massachusetts
Own: New York
Own: North Carolina
Own: Texas
Own: Virginia
Own: Washington
Program: Arizona
Program: Washington
Permit: California
Permit: Mexico
Resources
Assessments
Contact Information
Funding Sources
Maps and Data
Publications & Presentations
Related Tools
Sample Documents
Workshops

 

Marine Conservation Agreements     Copyright © 2008 The Nature Conservancy