Leasing and Ownership within Ocean and Coastal Waters
A Conservation Practitioner's Toolkit

Where are the in-water boundaries?

Boundaries associated with proprietary rights and regulatory management of coastal and ocean areas can be extremely complicated. Oftentimes boundaries of regulatory jurisdictions overlap with one another and more often than not boundaries associated with proprietary rights are ill-defined or completely unknown in the water. However, before leasing and ownership can be used as marine conservation strategies, the in-water proprietary boundaries and regulatory jurisdictions should be understood.

U.S. State and Federal Boundaries

An extensive primer on Shore and Sea Boundaries for the United States is available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). NOAA has also developed a summary manual for Marine Managed Areas: Best Practices for Boundary Making. The manual identifies many of the boundary issues that organizations may come across when working offshore. An annotated version of the manual's Appendix B (click on thumbnail text image at right) explains terms and boundaries associated with submerged lands, territorial seas, contiguous zone, and exclusive economic zone.

For a graphic depiction of offshore boundaries in the United States, click on the top thumbnail illustration at right.

A general depiction of state submerged lands boundaries can be viewed by clicking on the bottom thumbnail illustration at right.

Individual state and federal boundaries within ocean and coastal waters have several variables and consistent points that can be helpful to understand when undertaking leasing and ownership projects:

  • Terms and boundaries associated with state-owned intertidal and subtidal lands are state-specific (see U.S. State Summaries and Submerged Lands).
  • All states' seaward boundaries generally end at three nautical miles except for Texas and West Florida, which end at nine nautical miles in the Gulf of Mexico.
  • Regulatory boundaries for coastal zone management, provided by NOAA, are state-specific (download pdf, 29k).
  • The U.S. Federal Exclusive Economic Zone generally starts at the seaward boundary of state jurisdiction (three nautical miles except for Texas and West Florida) and extend 200 miles offshore from the baseline (state-defined and measured low water mark).
  • International waters and the open seas generally begin at 200 miles offshore, but this does not mean that countries do not exert some management and control past the 200-mile line.

Private Property Boundaries

Similar to state and federal boundaries, several variables complicate determining where private property boundaries are located within and along ocean and coastal waters of the United States:

  • The seaward boundary of privately owned upland parcels lying along the ocean coast can vary greatly—the boundaries may extend out to the high water line, the low water line, somewhere in between the high and low water lines, or somewhere below the low water line. In yet other situations, the upland parcel’s seaward boundary may be defined by the engineered boundaries shown on recorded survey plats, without regard to any tidal datum.
  • The exact nomenclature and measurement of the high water line and low water line is state-specific.
  • How far private property extends seaward is deed-specific and state-specific.
  • The private and public rights associated with private property (lying seaward of the high water line) are state-specific. Public rights on state-owned and privately-owned submerged lands are normally related to state-specific interpretations and applications of the public trust doctrine.
  • Whether and to what degree private property rights extend seaward past the fee-title ownership boundary of private parcels, into state-owned intertidal or subtidal lands, is state-dependent.
  • Whether intertidal lands, lying between the state-defined and measured high and low water lines, can be privately owned is state-specific. If intertidal lands can be privately-owned, these parcels may or may not be owned independently of the adjacent upland property. The adjacent upland property and the intertidal property may have been severed (if once part of the same parcel) or may have been established originally as separate parcels.

 

Step 1: Getting Started
1.1 Lease and Own 101
1.2 Myths
1.3 Important Terms
Step 2: Decision Checklist
2.1 Conservation Priorities
2.2 Threats and Strategies
2.3 Organization Capacity
2.4 Ownership and Use
2.5 Laws and Policies
2.6 Owners and Agencies
2.7 Partners and Funders
Step 3: Acquisition Checklist
3.1 Project Initiation
3.2 Title Report
3.3 Owner Contact
3.4 Proposal Completion
3.5 Terms and Conditions
3.6 Funding
3.7 Documentation
3.8 Due Diligence
3.9 Regulatory Permits
3.10 Final Actions
3.11 Site Plan
Step 4: Implementation
4.1 Science
4.2 Habitat
4.3 Maintenance
4.4 Public Use
4.5 Enforcement
4.6 Outreach
Country Summaries
Belize
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Indonesia
Mexico
Peru
United States
Other Countries
U.S. State Summaries
Alabama
Alaska
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Virginia
Washington
Other States
Case Studies
Agreement: Ecuador
Agreement: Fiji
Agreement: Philippines
Agreement: Phoenix Islands
Concession: Chile
Lease: California
Lease: Connecticut
Lease: Indonesia 1
Lease: Indonesia 2
Lease: Tanzania
Lease: Washington
Lease/Own: California
Lease/Own: UK
License: Rhode Island
Own: Massachusetts
Own: New York
Own: North Carolina
Own: Texas
Own: Virginia
Own: Washington
Program: Arizona
Program: Washington
Permit: California
Permit: Mexico
Resources
Assessments
Contact Information
Funding Sources
Maps and Data
Publications & Presentations
Related Tools
Sample Documents
Workshop

 

Leasing and Ownership within Ocean and Coastal Waters     Copyright © 2007 The Nature Conservancy